About Us

PeptideDosages.com is an independent educational resource dedicated to publishing accurate, clearly sourced peptide dosage protocols and research information. We built this site because the information researchers actually need, accurate reconstitution math, evidence-based dosing ranges, and honest safety profiles, was scattered across forums, buried in paywalled journals, or mixed in with unsourced marketing claims. We wanted to fix that.

Why We Exist

The peptide space has an information quality problem. Search for any peptide dosage protocol online and you’ll find dozens of results, most of which share the same characteristics: no citations, no source links, no context on whether the recommended dose comes from a clinical trial or a forum post from 2014. Dosing tables get copy-pasted from site to site with no one checking whether the numbers trace back to real data.

We started PeptideDosages.com to offer something different. Every protocol on this site is built from published clinical literature, FDA prescribing information, peer-reviewed studies, and established pharmacology references. We link to the original sources so you can verify every claim yourself. Where evidence is strong, we say so. Where it is preliminary or limited, we say that too. We believe transparency about evidence quality is more valuable than false confidence.

What We Publish

Dosage Protocols

Our core content is a growing library of over 100 dosage protocol pages covering single peptides, peptide blends, and peptide stacks. Each protocol page follows a consistent format: a protocol overview explaining what the peptide is and what it is researched for, a dosing schedule with specific amounts and frequencies, step-by-step reconstitution instructions with the exact BAC water volume and resulting concentration, syringe fill-line diagrams showing the precise draw volume, a supplies checklist, safety and side effect information, and inline citations linking to every source.

Dosage Calculator

Our Dosage Calculator lets you input any vial size, any BAC water volume, and any target dose to compute the exact syringe volume and total doses per vial. It works for every peptide and eliminates the reconstitution math that trips up beginners and experienced researchers alike.

Blog

Our blog publishes in-depth articles covering peptide science, mechanisms of action, clinical evidence, head-to-head comparisons, and emerging research. Every article includes inline citations to peer-reviewed sources, FDA labeling, or clinical trial data. We cover topics the protocol pages don’t have room for, including the “what is this peptide and should I care about it” questions that bring most people to the site in the first place.

Educational Guides

For readers who are new to the space or want to deepen their understanding, we publish standalone guides on foundational topics:

What Makes Us Different

Every claim is sourced

We do not publish dosage recommendations, mechanism descriptions, or safety information without a cited source. Our content links directly to peer-reviewed journal articles, FDA prescribing information, clinical trial registries, and authoritative medical references. If we cannot find a credible published source for a claim, we do not include the claim.

We grade evidence quality

Not all published evidence is equally strong. Our content distinguishes between claims backed by multiple randomized controlled trials and claims supported by a single animal study. We use language that reflects the strength of the evidence (“clinical trials demonstrate” vs. “preliminary research suggests”) so you can calibrate your confidence accordingly.

The math is always shown

Reconstitution and dosage math is where errors happen. Every protocol page shows the full calculation chain: vial content, BAC water volume, resulting concentration, target dose, and the exact syringe volume in both mL and units. We do not just say “inject 10 units” without explaining where that number comes from. If our math is wrong, anyone can check it and let us know.

Content is maintained, not abandoned

Peptide research moves quickly. New clinical trial results, updated FDA labeling, and emerging safety data can change dosing recommendations. We review and update published content as new evidence becomes available rather than publishing once and walking away. Our Editorial Policy describes this process in detail.

No unsourced claims

We do not repeat forum anecdotes, social media testimonials, or vendor marketing copy as fact. If something is widely discussed online but lacks published evidence, we say so explicitly rather than presenting it as established science. This means our content sometimes disagrees with what is popular. We are comfortable with that.

Who This Site Is For

PeptideDosages.com is designed for anyone who wants accurate, sourced peptide information presented clearly. Our readers include independent researchers, students studying peptide pharmacology, healthcare professionals looking for quick dosing references, and individuals who want to understand the evidence behind peptides they are reading about elsewhere.

We write for an audience that values accuracy over hype, appreciates seeing the source behind every claim, and prefers honest assessments of limited evidence over confident-sounding statements with no backing. If that describes you, this site was built for you.

What This Site Is Not

We want to be clear about our boundaries:

By the Numbers

A snapshot of what PeptideDosages.com offers today:

We add new protocols and content regularly based on reader requests and emerging research.

Get in Touch

Have a question, want to request a new dosage protocol, or found an error in our content? We want to hear from you.

Thank you for holding peptide information to a higher standard. That is exactly what we are here to do.